Candidate Rick Glazier – NC House Representative District 44

Candidates Name:  Rick Glazier
District:  NC House 44
Opponent:  Richard Button

What endorsements have you received for your current candidacy?

I have been endorsed by:  NC Police Benevolence Association, Sierra Club, North Carolina Association of Educators, and NC AFL-CIO.  I have also received extensive contributions from, among others, the NC Realtors PAC, the Apartment Association of NC, Carolinas Association of General Contractors, Nationwide Carolina PAC, NC Advocates for Justice PAC, NC Association of Electrical Cooperatives, NC Automobile Dealers PAC, NC College of Emerging Physicians PAC, NC Dental Society, NC Home Builder Association PAC, NC Hospital Association PAC, NC Pork Council PAC, South East Radiology Organization PAC, Wells Fargo Good Government PAC, McGuire Woods PAC, Eastern Board of Cherokee Indians, CSX, Century Link Employee PAC, Bayer Corporation PAC and NC Beer and Wine Wholesalers PAC.

If offered, would you accept contributions from our political action committee RPAC?

Yes, I would absolutely accept and have done so this spring.

If elected, what are you going to do for homeowners/property owners in Cumberland County?

I will continue to work across partisan lines to invest in and create the best educational, transportation, technological and energy infrastructure for our state and community.  I will continue to give support for the NC Housing Finance Agency and mortgage assistance programs.  Finally, I will increase justice system resources to more capably detain, prosecute, deter and incarcerate repeat home invasion offenders.

How would you propose to reduce or balance the state budget next year?

I do not propose to reduce the state budget next year, as it already is insufficient to meet critical education, senior health care, and basic infrastructure needs of the state.  Stability and sustainability are critical components of a sound fiscal policy.  Balancing the budget will require fidelity to priority decision-making; targeted revenue sources to particularly meet growing and vital educational and transportation needs; and the elimination of a series of unconstitutional, expensive and unjustified programs enacted by the majority the last three years particularly.

Do you see fracking as a positive or negative for the real estate industry?

I see fracking in general as a negative.  Given the very limited amount of shale in North Carolina, its proximity to the aquifer and the Cape Fear River Basin, the current economics of the industry, as well as technological and safety limitations of the industry, I do not support fracking on a large-scale in North Carolina.

If elected, what are your priorities for the long session next year?

A)  Significant improvement to K-12 education, including:  creation of a truly sustainable, competitive, and fair salary schedule for teachers and non-certified personnel; reversal of the elimination of advanced degree pay; restoration of cuts to in-classroom and school support positions; elimination of advanced degree pay; restoration of cuts to in-classroom and school support positions; elimination of the unconstitutional voucher program; and increase in textbook, digital and professional development and classroom resources for schools.

B)  Significant supervision of the coal ash cleanup and closure program; development of increased health, safety and property protections in fracking regulations and permitting; and an emphasis on water, air and recreational resource protection.

C)  Renewed commitment to the state’s community college and university systems.

D)  Realistic examination of resources and inefficiencies in the justice system.

E)  Creation of a more bi-partisan, less ideological, more transparent and civil dialogue and governance process in the General Assembly with a far deeper focus on problem-solving, compromise and the restoration of confidence in state government.

What new ideas/concepts can you bring to the office you are seeking?

As the Democrat in the General Assembly with the highest effectiveness rating, I am going to continue to reach across party lines whenever possible, find ways to connect to my colleagues, consider each issue in a thoughtful and informed manner, and operate with a belief the civility breeds civility and incivility breeds incivility, in all that we do and say.  My hope is to continue to move the House forward in its consideration of best evidence-based practices, to restore validity to the doctrine of local control and govern NC from the center rather than its ideological wings.

 

Hope Mills Tables Legion Road Rezoning

Town of Hope Mills
Board of Commissioners
Regular Meeting
August 18, 2014

What Happened: The following rezoning was tabled until September.

The rezoning of 8.59 acres from (residential) to (planned service and retail).   The property is located at the northwestern quadrant of Legion Road and NC HWY 162.  The planning staff recommends denial.  Low density residential is recommended.

Proposed use of property: 42,000 square foot Walmart neighborhood center

Voting to table the rezoning were Commissioners Bryan Marley, Edwin Deaver and Pat Edwards.  Voting in opposition were Commissioner Jerry Legge and Mayor Pro Tem Bob Gormon.

What Was Said:

Mayor Jackie Warner – “What can go there and what is relative to the request…that’s what we are voting on.”

Comments from Hope Mills residents:

“I was on the 2030 Land Use Committee.  We spent two years on the plan.  This area was to remain residential.”

“This is not about money but safety and quality of life.  The residents thought they’d stay in their dream homes.  We can have 150 new jobs and a large tax revenue.  The board voted unanimously the first time.”

“We are the land.  My land has been in the family since 1869.  We didn’t think we would ever leave.  Whether you rezone or not, we can’t stay thanks to the NCDOT.  The DOT took our neighborhood away.  We are hurtful that Hope Mills people are trying to tell me what to do with our land.”

“I learned in real estate to favor the highest and best use of land.  I learned in real estate to serve a growing population.  If you deny, another grocery store will come to you.”

“This is a hearing on a zoning.  This hearing has been hijacked.  You are voting on Wal-Mart.”

“Wal-Mart is not the 2nd coming of Jesus Christ.”

 What’s Next:

September 2 & 15 – Hope Mills Board of Commissioners

 

 

 

Candidate Wesley Meredith – NC Senate District 19

Candidate Name:  Wesley Meredith
District: 19 Senate
Opponent:   Billy Richardson

What endorsements have you received for your current candidacy?

I expect to receive a substantial amount of endorsements when we get closer to the election.  In the most recent election, I received a variety of endorsements and I hope to have the support of those agencies again in 2014.

If offered, would you accept contributions from our political action committee RPAC?

Yes of course, I appreciate those individuals and groups who support my views and greatly appreciate any contributions they decide to make to my re-election campaign.

If elected, what are you going to do for homeowners/property owners in Cumberland County?

I plan to stay the course from my last two terms.  Specifically, I want to continue growing the North Carolina economy by bringing more jobs and business to Cumberland.  This will increase property values and home ownership in our community.

Do you see fracking as a positive or negative for the real estate industry?

I see natural gas exploration as a great opportunity for this state and the real estate industry as well.  The American Chemistry Council determined that a 25 percent increase in natural gas would add over 400,000 jobs across the economy.  Developing a new domestic energy source by bringing natural gas drilling to NC means more high-paying and specialized jobs for residents.  Simply put, the more people with those kinds of jobs, the better it is for the real estate market. Additionally, property owners that qualify within NC regulations and standards would have the rights to sell mining rights to companies.

If elected, what are your priorities for the long session next year?

Over my last two terms, I spent my time serving in support of a few basic ideas that I ran on.  One goal was that I would do what I can to reduce taxes for North Carolinans; thanks to tax reform passed in 2013 we have ensured that ALL NC residents are now paying less in state taxes.  Another was to help small business in NC grow through cutting away the unnecessary regulations that choked their growth.  Burdensome regulations did not just cut down businesses in NC, they cut down jobs.  North Carolina now has a blossoming economy that has rebounded strongly from the recession.

With a balanced budget, a healthy tax system and an improved regulatory environment our state economy is in much better shape than it was when I took office.

Improving our public education system would also be a foundation of my third term.  The recent raises, averaging 7% across the board, for school teachers will ensure that our state recruits and retains the best in their profession.

However, my single most important priority remains being Cumberland County’s voice.  Representing the interests of this district is my most important duty in my floor votes, my committee chairmanships and my other responsibilities as your legislator.

What new ideas/concepts can you bring to the office you are seeking?

I like to think that I have done a good job helping my district, fulfilling my responsibilities and supporting the platform I ran on in my previous campaigns.  Listening to constituents, addressing their concerns and passing sensible legislation that solves those issues are my goals.

Growing the NC economy, reducing unemployment and improving public education remain the issues that I am primarily focused on.

 

Candidate Richard Button – NC House District 44

Candidate Name:  Richard Button
District:  NC House District 44
Opponent:  Representative Rick Glazier

What endorsements have you received for your current candidacy?

Bob Allen of Fay Block & Concrete Service, Inc.
Dr. Robert & Barbara Appel
Eric Nobles of Nobles Financial Planning

If offered, would you accept contribution from our political action committee, RPAC?

YES

If elected, what are you going to do for homeowners/property owners in Cumberland County?

Continue the efforts by the General Assembly to reduce taxes, both individual & corporate.  I will retain the mortgage interest deduction for income tax returns.  Continue the efforts to reduce burdensome regulations.  Keep NC on the path to becoming the number one state for business.  When businesses are healthy the economy grow, cities grow and property values increase.

How would you propose to reduce or balance the state budget next year?

1.  I promise to hold the budget to increases only in proportion to state population growth and economic growth.
2.  I promise to balance the budget relative to reasonable revenue projections.
3.  I will work to maintain and grow the “rainy day fund.”
4.  I would consider working toward a “Fair-Tax” policy

Do you see fracking as a positive or negative for the real estate industry?

I support natural gas reclamation (hydraulic fracturing) as a positive venture for NC.  The potential is greater than just the extraction of the raw product.  There are many everyday products that originate with natural gas (and crude oil).  Recently a Canadian company with a methanol plant in Chile, SA, moved the plant (not rebuilt, but moved) to Louisiana so that it was closer to the source of the raw product; natural gas.  If North Carolina’s production of natural gas is successful, we stand to gain from expansion by companies that will desire to be near a low cost source of raw material.

If elected, what are your priorities for the long session next year?

Additional measures to reduce taxes and regulations in order to encourage new businesses and help existing businesses to grow.

What new ideas/concepts can you bring to the office you are seeking?

With a 42 year mechanical engineering background in a manufacturing environment, I will bring a logical, work-a-day approach to legislative process.  Of those years in engineering, 22 years involved teaching/training and consulting in the USA and in foreign countries.  I believe this has equipped me with skills to work effectively with a variety of people and personalities.

Fayetteville City Council Meeting

Fayetteville City Council
Regular Meeting
August 11, 2014

Rezonings:

  • Property located at 2346 Gillespie street (Amerco Real Estate Co.) has been rezoned from commercial county zoning to light industrial zoning. Purpose of the rezoning is to expand the business.
  • Property located 2140 Skibo Road (Edwin Clark, Billie Clark, David Clark) has been rezoned from mixed residential and commercial zoning to half community commercial zoning.  Purpose of the rezoning is to expand property to commercial along Skibo Road

Other Items of Business:

Approved unanimously was the Coliseum Tourism Overlay Zoning District.  The purpose of this new district is to regulate development around the Crown Colisium.  The overlay district is generally bounded by Owen Drive, NC Hwy 87, E. Mountain Drive and US HWY 301 (Gillespie Street) on both sides.

Background: (the following information is from a city memo)

The proposed overlay is the result of several recent efforts:  major initiatives by Cumberland County to improve operations at the Crown; concerns about recent applications for new billboards along major approaches to the Crown; and renewed concern at all levels about the condition of the major gateways and areas around our economic engines.  

Most new development or significant redevelopment within the County overlay will likely involve annexation.  Consequently, staff developed a set of land use standards and regulations modeled after the County ordinance but incorporating other City standards.  The City’s overlay would be applied as part of any initial zoning.
Key issues include the boundaries, scope of uses allowed, on and off premise sign standards, and the nonconforming standards regarding when increased or complete compliance becomes required.  For the City overlay, all UDO standards would be applicable except where the Overlay establishes more restrictive standards. Specific examples of standards common to both the City and County regulations include:
Boundary:  The City and County ordinances recognize the same overall overlay area, but each has separate Code regulations, as similar as possible, that can be applied to properties with their respective jurisdictions.  The modified restrictions on billboards also match the area approved by the County.  
Uses:  The range of permitted uses is restricted to encourage those that complement and strengthen the event / tourism activity center anchored by the Crown Coliseum.  Because single family residential is not permitted, the County removed the existing Dogwood Acres subdivision from the overlay and exempted existing residential uses from the overlay standards. The City’s draft includes those provisions but, because of continuing concerns from residents, the draft includes a new statement at the very beginning that clearly excludes existing detached single family structures legally conforming before adoption of the overlay.
Signs:  The County’s C1(P) sign size standards are applied to the Overlay and the ordinance has been adjusted to incorporate the City/County standards directly rather than by reference.  It also incorporates County standards restricting billboards to roadways with limited or full-control of access as well as a 1000′ setback along Gillespie from Owen Drive to Seven Mountain Road, along with existing City billboard standards.

Nonconforming Standards:  The ordinance matches the County’s amendment in reducing the time to 180 days that a use could remain inactive before being required to comply with any new standards.  Compliance is also the same — triggered when damages or cost of repairs/renovations exceed 40 percent of the structure’s reproducible value or its bulk (including foundations).

The Council approved amendments to the City Code Chapter 30 of the Unified Development Ordinance which will define and classify cottage develoments.

Background: (the following information is from a city memo)

 

While a powerful tool in a redevelopment toolbox and increasingly desired by young professionals, empty nesters and retirees, this type of individual, compact housing in a community setting is not allowed by the code. The amendment defines, classifies and sets the use-specific standards for “cottage development.” Cottage developments are small clusters of houses oriented toward each other across a common green area and accessed by a small lane as part of a single development.  The use could be approved in the AR and all SF single family zoning districts through the Neighborhood Compatibility process.  Choosing this housing type triggers development standards regarding number, size, orientation, landscaping and common areas that help unify the development and protect the value and character of the surrounding area.

Because of its small size, a cottage development can be an opportunity for affordable housing, but many are very desirable higher end products that hold their value well because of the character of the houses, their level of finish (more resources are available for quality interior materials and detailing),  and the strong sense of community within this type of development.

 

The Council approved unanimously the Multimodal Transit Center Construction Contract in the amount of $11.625 million to Construction Systems Inc.  out of Fayetteville North Carolina.

Quote of the night:

Mayor Robertson – “Welcome Representative Floyd and Commissioner Evans.  So glad to have ya’ll slumming with us tonight.”